Comment on "Managing soil carbon" (II).

نویسندگان

  • W H Renwick
  • S V Smith
  • R O Sleezer
  • Robert W Buddemeier
چکیده

Lal et al. have recently argued (1, 2) that restoring soil carbon levels worldwide is important for a number of purposes, including reducing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. We agree, but we question how much eroded soil C is ultimately delivered to the atmosphere. Previous estimates of the proportion of eroded soil carbon oxidized range from 0% to near 100% (3, 4). We believe that the true value is nearer the extreme low end of that range, because much of this soil carbon is deposited in depressions, water impound-ments, and floodplains, where oxidation rates are lower than in the original soils (5, 6). Therefore, erosion-related emissions of C are probably much smaller than the ϳ1 gigaton (Gt) C/year estimated by Lal et al. We have argued previously (7) that erosion and subsequent deposition represent an apparent sink of ϳ1 Gt/year. Our published estimates suggest that soil erosion globally mobilizes ϳ1.4 Gt carbon annually (7), based on a robust budgetary estimate for the United States of 0.05 Gt C mobilization per year from erosion. Further, we demonstrated that U.S. river discharge of total organic C is about 20% of soil C erosion. We identified storage compartments for bulk sediment on land—large (inventoried) impoundments, smaller (uninventoried) im-poundments, and (by difference) alluvium— and estimated the organic carbon buried in each. The carbon not associated with any storage compartment was assigned to oxidation. Within the uncertainties in our bulk sediment budget, there was no evidence of net carbon oxidation, although we cited the basis on which our estimates could be raised from 0 to 20% oxidation. This estimate was based on budgetary calculations, not an assumption , as stated by Lal et al. (1, 3). Although the Lal et al. value of 20% is not inconsistent with that range, we believe that this high-end value is extreme for the United States and that higher percentages are well outside the constraints imposed by the budget. Indeed, the Lal et al. estimate of 1 Gt yearly carbon loss to the atmosphere is itself based on two unsubstantiated assumptions: 20% C oxidation in the erosion/transport process and 3% C content of soils (8). We have also demonstrated that deposi-tion in artificial impoundments is the largest single sink for eroded soil in the United States (9, 10). The carbon content of this sediment is similar to that of the soil from which it was derived, which in turn indicates …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Extraction and preconcentration of Pb(II) from water and soil samples using modified activated carbon

In this work, a new extractant was prepared by immobilizing ligand 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol, (5-Br-PADAP), on the activated carbon and applied to extraction of Pb(II) prior to determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. It was confirmed by FT- IR analysis. The metal ion was retained on the 0.05 g of the sorbent in the pH range 6-8, and then eluted with 5 mL of 0....

متن کامل

Interactive comment on “How will organic carbon stocks in mineral soils evolve under future climate? Global projections using RothC for a range of climate change scenarios” by P. Gottschalk et al

Many thanks for the comments. Please see our response below. To the first comment on NPP as a surrogate for soil carbon (C) inputs: NPP-C data from IMAGE or MIAMI are not directly used as soil C inputs to the RothC model. Soil C inputs are initially estimated by the model itself using an equilibrium simulation. Such a simulation uses the given soil organic carbon (SOC) content, here from the IS...

متن کامل

Interactive comment on “Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability and dependence on environmental factors” by U. Mishra and W. J. Riley

Interactive comment on “Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability and dependence on environmental factors” by U. Mishra and W. J. Riley K. Johnson (Referee) [email protected] We thank the reviewer for the detailed review and thoughtful suggestions that we think will improve our manuscript. Looking at the general, specific, and technical comments of the reviewer, we found the fol...

متن کامل

Session 4 Managing Soils for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation

Intense interest in soil organic matter (SOM) over its role in the storage of terrestrial carbon (C) and in the release of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere manifests itself in a renewal of research efforts to assess the impacts of different soil management systems on C dynamics. This paper assesses the future role of selected systems for managing agricultural and pastoral land; addressing ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Science

دوره 305 5690  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004